Download files
Abstract
The deformation mechanisms operating in diamond-like carbon (DLC) coatings on (100) and (111) Si, has been investigated. The effect of coating thickness, indenter geometry, substrate orientation and deposition technique on the deformation of DLC coatings and the underlying substrate was studied by undertaking nanoindentation followed by subsurface microstructural characterization. Uncoated (111) Si was also investigated for comparison. The observed microstructural features were correlated to the indentation response of the coatings and compared with simulation studies, as well as observations on uncoated Si.
In uncoated (111) Si, phase transformation was found to be responsible for the discontinuities in the load-displacement curves, similar to (100) Si. However, slip was activated on {311} planes instead of on {111} planes. Moreover, the density of defects was also significantly lower and their distribution asymmetric.
The coatings were adherent, uniformly thick and completely amorphous. The load-displacement curves displayed several pop-ins and a pop-out, the indentation loads for the first pop-in and the pop-out depending primarily on the thickness of the coating. The coatings exhibited localized compressive deformation in the direction of loading without any through-thickness cracks. The extent of this localized deformation increased with indentation load. Hardness and thickness of the coatings and the geometry of the indenter influenced the magnitude of compressive strains. Harder and thinner coatings and a blunt indenter exhibited the minimum degree of deformation. Densification by rearrangement of molecules has been suggested as the mechanism responsible for plastic compression.
At indentation loads corresponding to the first pop-in, (100) and (111) silicon substrates initially deformed by <111> and <311> slip respectively. Higher indentation loads caused phase transformation. Therefore, unlike in uncoated Si, dislocation nucleation in the Si substrate has been proposed as the mode responsible for the first pop-in. Subsequent pop-ins were attributed to further deformation by slip and twinning, phase transformation and extensive cracking (median and secondary cracks) of the substrate. The pop-out, however, was ascribed to phase transformation. Extensive deformation in the substrate, parallel to the interface, is attributed to the wider distribution of the stress brought about by the DLC coating. Good correlation was obtained between the nanoindentation response, microstructural features and simulation studies.