Abstract
A major reason for the substantial marketisation of human services over the last quarter century has been a belief that
greater contestability has a positive impact on service providers, by enabling new and innovative providers to enter
and giving all incumbents more incentive to improve services. Critics dispute this, claiming that the effects are often
negative, allowing the entry of profit-maximisers and generating incentives for all providers to cut costs at the
expense of good services. This thesis examines these conflicting claims, both theoretically in relation to human
services in general, and through an empirical study of one service in one location.
The first part of the thesis considers the theoretical implications for the concept of contestability when the product is
a human service, and the resulting effects on the structure and operatipn of markets, the type of providers, and the
incentives facing providers. A key aim is to assess marketisation on its own terms as far as possible and examine
human services industries in the same way as other industries. An analytical framework grounded in conventional
economic theory, but adapted to the reality of human services, is developed to examine con testability in specific
markets. This framework is then used for the empirical study of the community aged care industry in New South
Wales (NSW). This was a mixed-method study, with data obtained primarily from interviews, document analysis,
and analysis of funding data.
Both parts of the research show that there is substantial, intrinsic market failure in human services. This creates much
scope for poor practice by providers, and requires limits on contestability to maximise the outcomes of services.
Notwithstanding this, if implemented in a limited and strategic way, with a small number of providers competing on
the basis of quality, then contestability can have positive effects on the capacity of providers to deliver good services.
Even though there are tight limits on contestability in the NSW community aged care industry, there has been
continuing new entry, vigorous competition, stability in the supply of services, and strong incentives for providers to
improve the quality, responsiveness and efficiency of their services.