Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this thesis is to investigate Australian Indigenous spatial
ordering. The central question guiding the research is: how does south-east Australian
Indigenous spatial ordering differ from the European concept of spatial ordering? The
hypothesis is that south-east Australian Indigenous occupation of space can be understood
as interiority; in addition, it is also hypothesised that colonising western Europeans failed
to understand this occupation and as a result, sought to impose western European spatial
ordering in its place. The thesis presents a new narrative that is specifically associated
with the discipline of interior architecture.
Methodology: The overall research framework adopted in the thesis is a ‘spatial
approach.’ An interpretive-historical research methodology is operating in a majority of
the thesis chapters, bar one (Chapter 8), which diverges from this approach and adopts an
ethnographic-type research methodology. A number of research methods have been
utilised in order to gather and analyse the empirical material contained in this thesis.
Results: Empirical material has been gathered and considered in relation to, but not only,
the Sky Dome, palawa buildings, the site of Wybalenna, and Ring Trees. The aforesaid
examples contribute to the thesis by allowing a questioning of the following: how
cosmology lays the foundation for physical spatial ordering, how building types play a
role in defining spatial ordering, the resistance of the palawa peoples to western European
spatial ordering, and how Ring Trees in Wadi Wadi Country illustrate a spatial organising
principle.
Conclusions: The thesis concludes that western European spatial ordering, concerned
with an inside and outside, finds expression differently in south-east Australian
Indigenous buildings. These buildings are argued to operate as artefacts within spatial
divisions enacted at a much larger scale defined by cosmology and inhabitation of the
cultural landscape. The contribution that this thesis makes is to enable the western
European spatial ordering model to transform and accommodate variations of its
expression, as well as to contribute more broadly to the dialogue regarding Australian
Indigenous buildings and space.