Abstract
Research on the defence of small states is limited, particularly states in maritime strategic locations, such as Singapore and Taiwan. While a substantial body of respective research on the security of Singapore and Taiwan is available, there is insufficient comparative research of the national defence of the two states. This dissertation explores and compares the national defence of these two small states in strategic maritime locations. A case-study comparative approach is undertaken in this research of the two countries; deterrent strategies. This study concludes that Singapore presents a more suitable example for Taiwan in that it is also a small state focusing on keeping the peace and its own survival through the use of appropriate measures of deterrence. The ultimate goal of Taiwan's deterrence, similar to that of Singapore, is not to engage in war but to maintain the status quo in the short-term. Additionally, Taiwan's deterrence would also improve Taiwan's position vis-à-vis China in the long-term as well as bring an assurance that China's approaches toward Taiwan are firmly based in negotiation and respect for Taiwan.