Retaining the radical challenge: a reply to Wendy Hollway Thompson, Denise en_US 2021-11-25T13:43:34Z 2021-11-25T13:43:34Z 1994 en_US
dc.description.abstract This brief commentary is a response to one reaction to the 'Heterosexuality' issue of this journal. That reaction was a complaint that the discussion of heterosexuality had nothing good to say about it, and instead, focused on the radical feminist critique of heterosexuality's negative and oppressive aspects. This brief piece argues that that focus was necessary, (a) because radical feminism is the only voice raised in protest at the oppressive aspects of heterosexuality, and (b) because the space of the positive depiction of heterosexuality is already occupied by the malestream. en_US
dc.language English
dc.language.iso EN en_US
dc.rights CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 en_US
dc.rights.uri en_US
dc.source Legacy MARC en_US
dc.subject.other heterosexuality en_US
dc.subject.other social construction of desire en_US
dc.subject.other ideology en_US
dc.subject.other male domination en_US
dc.title Retaining the radical challenge: a reply to Wendy Hollway en_US
dc.type Journal Article en
dcterms.accessRights metadata only access
dspace.entity.type Publication en_US
unsw.description.notePublic This is the first of three brief contributions I made to the debate sparked off by the 'Heterosexuality' issue of Feminism & Psychology. The others are 'Theory and its discontents: another reply to Wendy Hollway (1995), and 'On arrogance: a reply to Lynne en_US
unsw.identifier.doiPublisher en_US
unsw.relation.faculty Arts Design & Architecture
unsw.relation.ispartofissue 2 en_US
unsw.relation.ispartofjournal Feminism & Psychology en_US
unsw.relation.ispartofpagefrompageto 326-329 en_US
unsw.relation.ispartofvolume 4 en_US
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Thompson, Denise, Social Policy Research Centre, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, UNSW en_US Social Policy Research Centre *
Resource type