Publication:
Do we really need to account for run bias when producing analytical results with stated uncertainty? - Reply
Do we really need to account for run bias when producing analytical results with stated uncertainty? - Reply
dc.contributor.author | O'Donnell, Gregory | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hibbert, D. Brynn | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-25T13:05:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-25T13:05:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement ( GUM) requires that measurement results are corrected for all recognized systematic effects. Therefore the answer to the comment of Kadis is unequivocally `yes`, run bias does need to be accounted for. The approach which combines a properly determined repeatability standard deviation and the uncertainty of the assessment of bias is a valid basis of the estimation of uncertainty of a measurement result. This approach produces a realisitic estimate of measurement uncertainty rather than a `safe` one. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-2654 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/39126 | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | EN | en_US |
dc.rights | CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/ | en_US |
dc.source | Legacy MARC | en_US |
dc.title | Do we really need to account for run bias when producing analytical results with stated uncertainty? - Reply | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | en_US |
unsw.accessRights.uri | https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
unsw.description.publisherStatement | Reproduced by permission of The Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC). | en_US |
unsw.identifier.doiPublisher | http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b711403f | en_US |
unsw.relation.faculty | Science | |
unsw.relation.ispartofissue | 12 | en_US |
unsw.relation.ispartofjournal | Analyst | en_US |
unsw.relation.ispartofpagefrompageto | 1275-1277 | en_US |
unsw.relation.ispartofvolume | 132 | en_US |
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation | O'Donnell, Gregory, Chemistry, Faculty of Science, UNSW | en_US |
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation | Hibbert, D. Brynn, Chemistry, Faculty of Science, UNSW | en_US |
unsw.relation.school | School of Chemistry | * |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Do we really need to account for run bias for UNSWworks.pdf
- Size:
- 96.83 KB
- Format:
- application/pdf
- Description: