Do we really need to account for run bias when producing analytical results with stated uncertainty? - Reply

Download files
Access & Terms of Use
open access
Altmetric
Abstract
The Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement ( GUM) requires that measurement results are corrected for all recognized systematic effects. Therefore the answer to the comment of Kadis is unequivocally `yes`, run bias does need to be accounted for. The approach which combines a properly determined repeatability standard deviation and the uncertainty of the assessment of bias is a valid basis of the estimation of uncertainty of a measurement result. This approach produces a realisitic estimate of measurement uncertainty rather than a `safe` one.
Persistent link to this record
DOI
Link to Publisher Version
Link to Open Access Version
Additional Link
Author(s)
O'Donnell, Gregory
;
Hibbert, D. Brynn
Supervisor(s)
Creator(s)
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
Curator(s)
Designer(s)
Arranger(s)
Composer(s)
Recordist(s)
Conference Proceedings Editor(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Corporate/Industry Contributor(s)
Publication Year
2007
Resource Type
Journal Article
Degree Type
UNSW Faculty