Reducing uncertainty in the climatic interpretations of speleothem δ18O

Abstract

We explore two principal areas of uncertainty associated with paleoclimate reconstructions from speleothem O-18 (O-18(spel)): potential non-stationarity in relationships between local climate and larger-scale atmospheric circulation, and routing of water through the karst aquifer. Using a O-18(spel) record from Turkey, the CSIRO Mk3L climate system model and the KarstFOR karst hydrology model, we confirm the stationarity of relationships between cool season precipitation and regional circulation dynamics associated with the North Sea-Caspian pattern since 1ka. Stalagmite O-18 is predicted for the last 500years, using precipitation and temperature output from the CSIRO Mk3L model and synthetic O-18 of precipitation as inputs for the KarstFOR model. Interannual variability in the O-18(spel) record is captured by KarstFOR, but we cannot reproduce the isotopically lighter conditions of the sixteenth to seventeenth centuries. We argue that forward models of paleoclimate proxies (such as KarstFOR) embedded within isotope-enabled general circulation models are now required.