A comparison of community, clinician and patient preferences for naming a cancer-related mutation

Access & Terms of Use
metadata only access
Abstract
This study compared language preferences to describe a cancer-related mutation in three groups: 253 members of the general community, 20 clinicians working in cancer genetics, and 269 individuals at increased risk of carrying a cancer-related mutation (including 198 women with a strong family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, and 71 individuals with a family history of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer). In the community sample, `faulty gene' was the preferred term to describe a cancer-related mutation, although females, those affected by cancer and those who felt cancer had a large impact on their lives were more likely to prefer the terms `gene change' or `altered gene'. In contrast, the clinicians' preference ratings for `faulty gene' and `gene change' were equal. When forced to choose between `faulty gene' and `altered gene', the high-risk patient group reported preferring `faulty gene', although over 40% were happy with either term. Further research investigating individuals' understanding of the different terms that can be used to describe a cancer-related mutation, and the functional impact of these terms on patients' thoughts and feelings about their condition and on their health-related behavior after genetic counseling would be worthwhile.
Persistent link to this record
DOI
Additional Link
Author(s)
Wakefield, Claire
Meiser, Bettina
Homewood, J
Barlow-Stewart, Kristine
Tucker, Katherine
Supervisor(s)
Creator(s)
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
Curator(s)
Designer(s)
Arranger(s)
Composer(s)
Recordist(s)
Conference Proceedings Editor(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Corporate/Industry Contributor(s)
Publication Year
2007
Resource Type
Journal Article
Degree Type
UNSW Faculty