Publication:
Australian prescribers' perspectives on ART initiation in the era of "treatment as prevention"

dc.contributor.author Mao, Limin en_US
dc.contributor.author de Wit, John en_US
dc.contributor.author Adam, Philippe en_US
dc.contributor.author Post, Jeffrey en_US
dc.contributor.author Crooks, Levinia en_US
dc.contributor.author Kidd, Michael en_US
dc.contributor.author Slavin, Sean en_US
dc.contributor.author Kippax, Susan en_US
dc.contributor.author Wright, Edwina en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2021-11-25T12:30:43Z
dc.date.available 2021-11-25T12:30:43Z
dc.date.issued 2013 en_US
dc.description.abstract This study explores Australian prescribers' attitudes towards Treatment as Prevention (TasP) and their practices around initiating combination antiretroviral treatment (cART) for HIV. A brief online survey was conducted nationally amongst antiretroviral treatment (ART) prescribers in Australia. The sample broadly represented ART prescribers in Australia (N = 108), with 40.7% general practitioners (GPs), 25.9% sexual health clinic-based physicians and 21.3% hospital-based infectious diseases physicians. About 60% of respondents had been treating HIV-positive patients for more than 10 years. Respondents estimated that about 70-80% of all their HIV-positive patients were receiving ART. Over half of the prescribers agreed very strongly that their primary concern in recommending cART initiation was clinical benefit to individual patients rather than any population benefit. A majority of the prescribers (68.5%) strongly endorsed cART initiation before CD4+ T-cell count drops below 350 cells/mm(3), and a further 22.2% strongly endorsed cART initiation before CD4+ T-cell count drops below 500 cells/mm(3). Regarding the optimal timing of cART initiation, this study shows that prescribers in Australia in 2012 focus primarily on the benefits for their individual patients. Prescribers may need more convincing evidence of individual health benefits or increased knowledge about the population health benefits for a TasP approach to be effective in Australia. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0954-0121 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/53970
dc.language English
dc.language.iso EN en_US
dc.rights CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 en_US
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/ en_US
dc.source Legacy MARC en_US
dc.title Australian prescribers' perspectives on ART initiation in the era of "treatment as prevention" en_US
dc.type Journal Article en
dcterms.accessRights metadata only access
dspace.entity.type Publication en_US
unsw.accessRights.uri http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
unsw.identifier.doiPublisher http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2013.766304 en_US
unsw.relation.faculty Arts Design & Architecture
unsw.relation.ispartofissue 11 en_US
unsw.relation.ispartofjournal AIDS Care en_US
unsw.relation.ispartofpagefrompageto 1375-1379 en_US
unsw.relation.ispartofvolume 25 en_US
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Mao, Limin, Centre for Social Research in Health, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, UNSW en_US
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation de Wit, John, Centre for Social Research in Health, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, UNSW en_US
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Adam, Philippe, Centre for Social Research in Health, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, UNSW en_US
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Post, Jeffrey en_US
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Crooks, Levinia en_US
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Kidd, Michael en_US
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Slavin, Sean en_US
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Kippax, Susan, Social Policy Research Centre, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, UNSW en_US
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Wright, Edwina en_US
unsw.relation.school Centre for Social Research in Health *
unsw.relation.school Social Policy Research Centre *
Files
Resource type