Psychological distress across the lifespan: examining age-related item bias in the Kessler-6 Psychological Distress Scale

Download files
Access & Terms of Use
open access
Abstract
Background: Old age respondents may systemically differ in their responses to measures of psychological distress over and above their actual latent distress levels when compared to younger respondents. The current study aimed to investigate the potential for age-related bias(es) in the Kessler 6 psychological distress scale (K6) items. Methods: Data from the 2007 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing were analysed using Item Response Theory to detect the presence of item bias in each of the K6 items. The potential for item bias was assessed by systematically comparing young (16-34), middle age (35-64), and old age (65-85) respondents. The significance and magnitude of the item bias between the age groups was assessed using the log-likelihood ratio method of differential item functioning. Results: After statistical adjustment, there were no biases of significant magnitude influencing the endorsement of K6 items between young and middle age respondents or between middle age and old age respondents. There was a bias of significant magnitude present in the endorsement of the K6 item addressing levels of fatigue between young and old age respondents. Conclusions: Despite the identification of significant item bias in the endorsement of K6 items between the age groups, the magnitude and influence of the bias on total K6 scores is likely to have little influence on the overall interpretation of group data when comparing psychological distress across the lifespan. Researchers should take some caution however when examining individual levels of fatigue related to psychological distress in older individuals.
Persistent link to this record
DOI
Additional Link
Author(s)
Sunderland, Matthew
Hobbs, Megan J.
Anderson, Tracy M.
Andrews, Gavin
Supervisor(s)
Creator(s)
Editor(s)
Translator(s)
Curator(s)
Designer(s)
Arranger(s)
Composer(s)
Recordist(s)
Conference Proceedings Editor(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Corporate/Industry Contributor(s)
Publication Year
2012
Resource Type
Journal Article
Degree Type
UNSW Faculty
Files
download final peer reviewed version.pdf 293.33 KB Adobe Portable Document Format
Related dataset(s)