Publication:
Women in Prison - 25 years after Nagle

dc.contributor.author Baldry, Eileen en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2021-11-25T13:33:53Z
dc.date.available 2021-11-25T13:33:53Z
dc.date.issued 2004 en_US
dc.description.abstract The Nagle Royal Commission Report recommendations fall into 2 categories: the ‘fundamental principles’ group and the practical ‘what-to-do-on-the-ground’ group. Both are essential to reform but, without adherence to the principles of prison as the last resort, prison not to be used to lock away people with social problems society can’t handle and constant external vigilance (Nagle 1978), the practical reforms, important though they are, will not resolve the serious matters Nagle identified. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1034-5329 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/39962
dc.language English
dc.language.iso EN en_US
dc.rights CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 en_US
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/ en_US
dc.source Legacy MARC en_US
dc.title Women in Prison - 25 years after Nagle en_US
dc.type Journal Article en
dcterms.accessRights metadata only access
dspace.entity.type Publication en_US
unsw.accessRights.uri http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
unsw.description.notePublic Original inactive link: http://www.law.usyd.edu.au/~criminology/journal.htm en_US
unsw.relation.faculty Arts Design & Architecture
unsw.relation.ispartofissue 1 en_US
unsw.relation.ispartofjournal Current Issues in Criminal Justice en_US
unsw.relation.ispartofpagefrompageto 101-105 en_US
unsw.relation.ispartofvolume 16 en_US
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Baldry, Eileen, Social Sciences & International Studies, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, UNSW en_US
unsw.relation.school School of Social Sciences *
Files
Resource type