Publication:
Audit partner life cycle and implications for audit quality

dc.contributor.advisor Carson, Elizabeth en_US
dc.contributor.advisor Simnett, Roger en_US
dc.contributor.author Xu, Yang en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-15T12:39:09Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-15T12:39:09Z
dc.date.issued 2019 en_US
dc.description.abstract This thesis examines how audit partners change over their life cycle and how those changes affect audit quality. Study 1 investigates whether human capital investment changes as audit partners become more experienced and whether an increase in the partners’ career horizon can motivate them to invest more in human capital. I find that, as audit partners gain experience, both Big N and non-Big N partners charge a small fee premium for their experience but allow more accruals to be reported by clients. However, Big N partners are more likely to issue going concern opinions as they gain experience, while non-Big N partners are less likely to do so. I also find weak evidence for the effect of postretirement work on partner performance. Study 2 investigates how the incentive to invest in industry specialisation differs from general human capital and its implications for audit quality over partners’ life cycle. The results show that audit partners demand a fee increase for another year’s experience when they are industry specialists working within their specialisation (3.2% - 5.5% per annum), which is higher than when they work outside their specialisation (1.9% - 2.3% per annum). In comparison, nonspecialists receive an annual fee increase of 2.3% - 3.6%. The results show that audit partners allow clients to report higher levels of absolute value of accruals as they are more experienced, regardless of whether they have a specialisation or not, which is sensitive to the control of the GFC and its aftermath. The results also show that specialist partners are more effective at restraining their clients from earnings management as they become more experienced, but only when they work within their specialisation and not when they work outside their specialisation. Findings from the thesis have implications for practitioners and regulators. Audit firms may consider 1) costs and benefits of their partner early retirement policies and 2) providing additional support for less experienced partners to ensure high audit quality. Regulators from quality review programs may target engagements audited by less experienced partners and/or those audited by industry specialists working outside their specialisation as warranting their attention. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/64588
dc.language English
dc.language.iso EN en_US
dc.publisher UNSW, Sydney en_US
dc.rights CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 en_US
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/ en_US
dc.subject.other Life cycle en_US
dc.subject.other Audit quality en_US
dc.subject.other Audit partner en_US
dc.title Audit partner life cycle and implications for audit quality en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dcterms.accessRights open access
dcterms.rightsHolder Xu, Yang
dspace.entity.type Publication en_US
unsw.accessRights.uri https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
unsw.date.embargo 2021-12-01 en_US
unsw.description.embargoNote Embargoed until 2021-12-01
unsw.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/3863
unsw.relation.faculty Business
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Xu, Yang, Accounting, Australian School of Business, UNSW en_US
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Carson, Elizabeth, Accounting, Australian School of Business, UNSW en_US
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Simnett, Roger, Accounting, Australian School of Business, UNSW en_US
unsw.relation.school School of Accounting *
unsw.thesis.degreetype PhD Doctorate en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
public version.pdf
Size:
3.48 MB
Format:
application/pdf
Description:
Resource type