Publication:
Prosocial reasoning and empathy in gifted children

dc.contributor.advisor Gross, Miraca en_US
dc.contributor.advisor Rogers, Karen en_US
dc.contributor.author Hay, Peta Kerin en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-21T16:49:22Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-21T16:49:22Z
dc.date.issued 2008 en_US
dc.description.abstract This study aimed to enhance understanding of the moral reasoning of gifted children. While research has explored the justice moral reasoning of gifted children (Arbuthnot, 1973; Chovan & Freeman, 1993; Gross, 1993; Henderson, Gold, & Clarke, 1984; Howard-Hamilton, 1994), this study explored prosocial moral reasoning, moral reasoning which involves conflict between one’s own needs and desires and the needs and desires of others. In addition, this study sought to gather empirical evidence for literature claims that gifted children have higher levels of empathy than their age peers (Lovecky, 1997; Piechowski, 2003; Silverman, 1993b). The study aimed to investigate the possible relationships among giftedness, prosocial reasoning and empathy. Primary (elementary) school students aged between 9 and 12 years in the Sydney Metropolitan area were administered The Prosocial Reasoning Objective Measure (PROM), The Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) and The Index of Empathy for Children and Adolescents (IOE) questionnaires. The results for gifted students (n = 176) were compared with a control group of students not identified as gifted (n = 128). The study found that gifted students used more of the highest level of prosocial reasoning in the PROM than their age peers. Furthermore, gifted students used more empathic concern, fantasy empathy and cognitive empathy than their age peers, although ability was not predictive of the other empathy factors in the instruments. Small but significant correlations between some types of empathy and some levels of prosocial reasoning were also found, indicating possible relationships between empathy and prosocial reasoning. Interviews were conducted with selected students (n = 13) from the above sample, along with some of their teachers (n = 5) and parents (n = 2). Despite the small sample, the interviews seemed to indicate a relationship between experience with bullying and prosocial reasoning. The study highlights the need for an empathy questionnaire that specifically tests cognitive and affective empathy in children. A new questionnaire may unravel some of the seemingly contradictory results in the present study. The study also provides empirical evidence that gifted children use higher levels of prosocial moral reasoning and empathy than their age-peers. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1959.4/41756
dc.language English
dc.language.iso EN en_US
dc.publisher UNSW, Sydney en_US
dc.rights CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 en_US
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/ en_US
dc.subject.other Moral Reasoning en_US
dc.subject.other Gifted en_US
dc.subject.other Empathy en_US
dc.title Prosocial reasoning and empathy in gifted children en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dcterms.accessRights open access
dcterms.rightsHolder Hay, Peta Kerin
dspace.entity.type Publication en_US
unsw.accessRights.uri https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
unsw.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/17940
unsw.relation.faculty Arts Design & Architecture
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Hay, Peta Kerin, Education, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, UNSW en_US
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Gross, Miraca, Education, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, UNSW en_US
unsw.relation.originalPublicationAffiliation Rogers, Karen, Gifted Education, Research, Resource & Information Centre, UNSW en_US
unsw.relation.school School of Education *
unsw.thesis.degreetype PhD Doctorate en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
whole.pdf
Size:
2.59 MB
Format:
application/pdf
Description:
Resource type